Why should my creativity be shackled by my oppressor, which is my landlord. You see my landlords are the ones who take my loans and distribute them amongst themselves. They are the ones that read scriptures of Shakespeare and tell me that this is right and i am wrong like the slaves from the past. Taking my place on this ship that sells to this wilderness that they deluded me from, telling me that the land would be called "Creativity" and when i got there i found out that the land was called Imprisonment, and big brother to shackles. They tell to work the fields in your paper, but to do it in their way. How can someone create art if the canvas is already there on the paper? Creativity is a blessing but on this day it is but a memory in my eyes. I too share sometimes formalist opinions. How in the world can your critique creativity. Shakespeare sometimes even wrote in lesser forms of language, a language that isn't proper which contradicts his whole background, which is England. England, which is the highest degree of what, was proper and what was not. So in a sense I feel as tho I am but a savage when i write. I don't write what the completion of the paper is and neither do I savagely. I am but a slave to what my mind illustrates to me. So it’s like I have two masters. The first being my mind and the second being my preceptor.
Well i am against this religion of cannons that loves to fire upon me. I respect the literature but I do not feel as thou i have to follow the patterns of a handful of men. First off these writers never wrote in the same patterns as their predecessors, they had their own patterns that they made up and over time a group of civilians like the "puritans" ran with it and deemed as a religion. They made these works into cannons by their there obsession with Shakespeare’s work, and told other poets first off, to be creativity but also that you have to follow this pattern or else your work will be deemed unfit for literature. My friend, this is blasphemous in my eyes, because i am differing to another master and not worshiping the one who is not me? So is it that I myself is selfish or is it that I am just a "atheist" in the literary world? Wasn't it Bosch the won that was cynic? Cynic meaning a person who believes that only selfishness motivates human actions and who disbelieves in or minimizes selfless acts or disinterested point of view, also one of a sect of Greek philosophers, 4th century b.c. who advocated the doctrines that virtue is the only good, that the essence of virtue is self-control, and that surrender to any external influence is beneath human dignity.
Bosch concerned himself with executing the painting - "he must have" and that freed his imagination, and left him unguarded. By the statement alone i have executed and won my own argument that you cannot control creative because you control me in a sense. Check mate, like my favorite rapper said what you about to witness is my thoughts, right or wrong, just what I was feeling at the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment